The Campbell's acquisition may be beneficial, but it understandably generates some concern. Campbell's is known for selling a very affordable line of soups. How will the premium brand Rao's fare within the Campbell's portfolio? The company's track record of acquisitions is decidedly mixed. In the late 1960s, it acquired Godiva's chocolates. That brand thrived under Campbell's ownership for many years, but ultimately, the company divested Godiva because it didn't fit very well with the other products in the portfolio. More recently, the company divested Bolthouse Farms at a steep discount to the price they had acquired the brand for just seven years earlier.
The question remains whether valuable synergies exist between Campbell's and Rao's. Why are these firms more valuable together than apart? Can Campbell's manage the brand more successfully than it has already been managed? That seems unlikely, given the parent company's lack of recent familiarity and success with super premium brands. Moreover, they aren't buying a brand in distress; they are purchasing a brand that is already performing at a very high level.
Any attempt to drive synergies must be taken with caution as it may dilute the quality of the premium tomato sauce brand. For now, Campbell's has assured customers and investors that it won't change the taste and quality of the popular tomato sauce. Still, we should expect some pressure to justify the acquisition premium by creating synergies. That pressure can be counterproductive at times when mainstream companies acquire much more premium brands.
No comments:
Post a Comment