https://buffalo7.co.uk/blog/how-to-get-buy-in/ |
To test their hypothesis, they conducted a field experiment with Oregon Department of Transportation. Several years ago, the department migrated to a new carpool platform for residents of the state. The scholars noted that there were many inactive users on the old platform (87% of all accounts). In other words, they had established accounts, but they were not actually using the carpool services.
The scholars examined whether a slightly different procedure for migrating inactive users to the new platform might have an impact on sign-ups and usage. Some users were provided information regarding a low-effort method for moving to the new platform. Others received information regarding a sign-up process that involved more effort. Here's what the scholars found:
"More Effort group took more trips overall, despite there being fewer participants who signed up to the platform: while 694 signed up from the Less Effort group, only 511 signed up from the More Effort group. During our 122-day study period, we observed 9,147 total trips; out of these, the More Effort group took 5,106 trips, while the Less Effort group took 4,311, meaning that More Effort group took 795 more trips overall than our Less Effort group."
Why did adding friction actually increase usage of the carpool platform? The scholars don't have a way of actually determining the psychological mechanism underlying individual behavior in this case. However, they offer some possible explanations. For example, they suggest that people may "feel a greater sense of psychological ownership over the action and value it to a greater extent, which would increase their likelihood of following through." They also note that the sunk cost effect may be at play here. If you are invested some time and effort into a process, you may continue down that path because you don't want to "waste" the initial investment you have made.
No comments:
Post a Comment