How do we decide which assumptions warrant the most attention and should be tested vigorously? Jon Fjeld was a long-time tech industry executive, and he now teaches at Duke's Fuqua School of Business. He has a simple method for determining which assumptions need to be scrutinized first. He argues that three factors are critical:
1. Severity: How big is the impact on the project if the assumption is not true?
2. Probability: How likely is it that the assumption is not true?
3. Cost: How expensive and time consuming is it to test the assumption?
Fjeld uses these three factors to create a simple ratio that can be used to rank your assumptions. His equation is: (Severity x Probability)/Cost. The higher the ratio, the more important it is that your prioritize the testing and validation of that assumption. While we don't actually have a clear way to quantify these three factors, the concept of this ratio makes good sense. By thinking about these three factors, and their relationship to one another, we can do a better job of deciding how we want to test, experiment, and prototype before making a big bet.

2 comments:
Excellent breakdown. I like how you highlighted the key takeaways without overcomplicating anything. DealPromoX had a related piece, and this complements it really well.
I explored DealPromoX and it’s surprising how many useful deals you can find there. It’s convenient for shoppers who want to stretch their budget a little further.
Post a Comment