Max Bazerman and his co-authors have written a new working paper examining how an organization might counteract gender biases in promotion decisions. They found that stereotypes and biases are more prevalent when a manager evaluates an individual in isolation. However, those biases fade away, and managers focus more on performance alone, when they are comparing multiple candidates as they make promotion decisions. Here is their abstract:
We examine a new intervention to overcome gender biases in hiring,
promotion, and job assignments: an "evaluation nudge," in which people
are evaluated jointly rather than separately regarding their future
performance. Evaluators are more likely to focus on individual
performance in joint than in separate evaluation and on group
stereotypes in separate than in joint evaluation, making joint
evaluation the money-maximizing evaluation procedure. Our findings are
compatible with a behavioral model of information processing and with
the System 1/System 2 distinction in behavioral decision research where
people have two distinct modes of thinking that are activated under
certain conditions.
1 comment:
Important and vital information. I believe is helpful for anyone with interest on business.
Sentric Inc.
Post a Comment